مكتبة كلية الحقوق— جامعة القاهرة

Faculty of Law Library - Cairo University

Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from Google Jackets

ضمان فعل عديم التمييز في القانون المدني الأردني : دراسة مقارنة / إعداد ممدوح يوسف سليمان النجادا ؛ إشراف عبدالرحمن جمعة

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: Arabic Producer: الأردن : كلية الدراسات العليا - الجامعة الأردنية، 1999Description: 245 صفحة ؛ 30 سمContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • Computer
Carrier type:
  • Online Resource
Subject(s): Genre/Form: DDC classification:
  • 346 21
Online resources: Dissertation note: أطروحة (ماجستير)-الجامعة الأردنية، كلية الدراسات العليا، قسم القانون المدني 1999. Abstract: It has been revealed from our study of the dhaman of the act of the indiscern in the Islamic Fiqh and other civil laws that the indiscern has to be held liable for his acts tortious to others with some variance in the position of civil laws. First and foremost some of these laws how indorsed Dhaman as the responsibility of the indiscern, as such the injured party may have recourse in his claim on the indiscern, while other laws have provided that the in discern will not be held liable for his tortious act. Other have a dopted a neutral stand as they do not permit that the indiscern be held responsible unless the one responsible for the indiscern be held accountable therefore. Through this paper it has been found that Jordan civil law has provided for the personal and initial responsibility of the indiscern. Consequently, the injured party can file his claim against the indiscern. However, holding the indiscern liable has certain shortcomings as can be seen in the context of Article (278) of the Jordan Civil Law. This Article has added no new provision to what has been determined under Article 256 of the Jordan Civil Law. Nevertheless, the provision of Article (288) of Jordan civil law has been drowned in confusion, therefore, the responsibility of the party overseeing the indiscern in accordance with the provisions of Article (288) shall be an alternative and conditioned responsibility and does not authorize the injured to hold the party overseeing the indiscern responsible. The study has incorporated the following recommendations: First: That it is necessary to repeal the provision of Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law when drafting this law is considered. Second: that it is imperative to substitutes Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law with the corresponding Article in the draft unified Arab Financial transactions law. Third: That it is necessary to take into consideration the Indiscern security fund sponsored by the State.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis مكتبة كلية الحقوق - المبنى الرئيسي القانون المدني Law1 02 MSC 1999 0200946 C1 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Not for loan T02-00946

رسائل نسخة منفردة

أطروحة (ماجستير)-الجامعة الأردنية، كلية الدراسات العليا، قسم القانون المدني 1999.

يشتمل على إرجاعات بيبليوجرافية: 230-243 صفحة

It has been revealed from our study of the dhaman of the act of the indiscern in the Islamic Fiqh and other civil laws that the indiscern has to be held liable for his acts tortious to others with some variance in the position of civil laws. First and foremost some of these laws how indorsed Dhaman as the responsibility of the indiscern, as such the injured party may have recourse in his claim on the indiscern, while other laws have provided that the in discern will not be held liable for his tortious act. Other have a dopted a neutral stand as they do not permit that the indiscern be held responsible unless the one responsible for the indiscern be held accountable therefore.
Through this paper it has been found that Jordan civil law has provided for the personal and initial responsibility of the indiscern. Consequently, the injured party can file his claim against the indiscern.
However, holding the indiscern liable has certain shortcomings as can be seen in the context of Article (278) of the Jordan Civil Law. This Article has added no new provision to what has been determined under Article 256 of the Jordan Civil Law. Nevertheless, the provision of Article (288) of Jordan civil law has been drowned in confusion, therefore, the responsibility of the party overseeing the indiscern in accordance with the provisions of Article (288) shall be an alternative and conditioned responsibility and does not authorize the injured to hold the party overseeing the indiscern responsible.
The study has incorporated the following recommendations:
First: That it is necessary to repeal the provision of Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law when drafting this law is considered.
Second: that it is imperative to substitutes Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law with the corresponding Article in the draft unified Arab Financial transactions law.
Third: That it is necessary to take into consideration the Indiscern security fund sponsored by the State.

النص بالعربية والملخص بالإنجليزية.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image

Implemented and Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady

© All rights reserved — Faculty of Law, Cairo University