ضمان فعل عديم التمييز في القانون المدني الأردني : دراسة مقارنة /
ممدوح يوسف سليمان النجادا
ضمان فعل عديم التمييز في القانون المدني الأردني : دراسة مقارنة / إعداد ممدوح يوسف سليمان النجادا ؛ إشراف عبدالرحمن جمعة - 245 صفحة ؛ 30 سم.
رسائل نسخة منفردة
أطروحة (ماجستير)-الجامعة الأردنية، كلية الدراسات العليا، قسم القانون المدني 1999.
يشتمل على إرجاعات بيبليوجرافية: 230-243 صفحة
It has been revealed from our study of the dhaman of the act of the indiscern in the Islamic Fiqh and other civil laws that the indiscern has to be held liable for his acts tortious to others with some variance in the position of civil laws. First and foremost some of these laws how indorsed Dhaman as the responsibility of the indiscern, as such the injured party may have recourse in his claim on the indiscern, while other laws have provided that the in discern will not be held liable for his tortious act. Other have a dopted a neutral stand as they do not permit that the indiscern be held responsible unless the one responsible for the indiscern be held accountable therefore.
Through this paper it has been found that Jordan civil law has provided for the personal and initial responsibility of the indiscern. Consequently, the injured party can file his claim against the indiscern.
However, holding the indiscern liable has certain shortcomings as can be seen in the context of Article (278) of the Jordan Civil Law. This Article has added no new provision to what has been determined under Article 256 of the Jordan Civil Law. Nevertheless, the provision of Article (288) of Jordan civil law has been drowned in confusion, therefore, the responsibility of the party overseeing the indiscern in accordance with the provisions of Article (288) shall be an alternative and conditioned responsibility and does not authorize the injured to hold the party overseeing the indiscern responsible.
The study has incorporated the following recommendations:
First: That it is necessary to repeal the provision of Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law when drafting this law is considered.
Second: that it is imperative to substitutes Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law with the corresponding Article in the draft unified Arab Financial transactions law.
Third: That it is necessary to take into consideration the Indiscern security fund sponsored by the State.
النص بالعربية والملخص بالإنجليزية.
القانون المدني
أسباب انعدام التمييز ضمان فعل عديم التمييز عديم التمييز على النفس خصائص ضمان عديم التمييز
رسائل جامعية--1999. --الجامعة الأردنية
346
ضمان فعل عديم التمييز في القانون المدني الأردني : دراسة مقارنة / إعداد ممدوح يوسف سليمان النجادا ؛ إشراف عبدالرحمن جمعة - 245 صفحة ؛ 30 سم.
رسائل نسخة منفردة
أطروحة (ماجستير)-الجامعة الأردنية، كلية الدراسات العليا، قسم القانون المدني 1999.
يشتمل على إرجاعات بيبليوجرافية: 230-243 صفحة
It has been revealed from our study of the dhaman of the act of the indiscern in the Islamic Fiqh and other civil laws that the indiscern has to be held liable for his acts tortious to others with some variance in the position of civil laws. First and foremost some of these laws how indorsed Dhaman as the responsibility of the indiscern, as such the injured party may have recourse in his claim on the indiscern, while other laws have provided that the in discern will not be held liable for his tortious act. Other have a dopted a neutral stand as they do not permit that the indiscern be held responsible unless the one responsible for the indiscern be held accountable therefore.
Through this paper it has been found that Jordan civil law has provided for the personal and initial responsibility of the indiscern. Consequently, the injured party can file his claim against the indiscern.
However, holding the indiscern liable has certain shortcomings as can be seen in the context of Article (278) of the Jordan Civil Law. This Article has added no new provision to what has been determined under Article 256 of the Jordan Civil Law. Nevertheless, the provision of Article (288) of Jordan civil law has been drowned in confusion, therefore, the responsibility of the party overseeing the indiscern in accordance with the provisions of Article (288) shall be an alternative and conditioned responsibility and does not authorize the injured to hold the party overseeing the indiscern responsible.
The study has incorporated the following recommendations:
First: That it is necessary to repeal the provision of Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law when drafting this law is considered.
Second: that it is imperative to substitutes Article (288) of the Jordan Civil Law with the corresponding Article in the draft unified Arab Financial transactions law.
Third: That it is necessary to take into consideration the Indiscern security fund sponsored by the State.
النص بالعربية والملخص بالإنجليزية.
القانون المدني
أسباب انعدام التمييز ضمان فعل عديم التمييز عديم التمييز على النفس خصائص ضمان عديم التمييز
رسائل جامعية--1999. --الجامعة الأردنية
346