MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
10441namaa22004811i 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - أخر تعامل مع التسجيلة |
|---|
| control field |
20241215121540.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
230507s2022 ua xa frm 000 arand d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloguing agency |
EG-GICUC |
| Language of cataloging: |
ara |
| Transcribing agency |
EG-GICUC |
| Modifying agency |
EG-GICUC |
| Description conventions |
rda |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE |
|---|
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
ara |
| Language code of summary or abstract |
ara |
| Language code of sung or spoken text |
ara |
| 049 ## - Acquisition Source |
|---|
| Acquisition Source |
إيداع |
| 082 04 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER |
|---|
| Classification number |
342.06 |
| Edition number |
21 |
| 097 ## - Degree |
|---|
| Degree |
Ph.D |
| 099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC) |
|---|
| Local Call Number |
Law 07 PHD 2022 |
| 100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Authority record control number or standard number |
محمود يوسف السيد أبو الغيط |
| Preparation |
مؤلف. |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
دور القضاء في حماية حقوق الأقليات : |
| Remainder of title |
دراسة مقارنة / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
إعداد محمود يوسف السيد ابو الغيط ؛ إشراف جابر جاد نصار |
| 246 15 - VARYING FORM OF TITLE |
|---|
| Title proper/short title |
The role of the judiciary in protecting the rights of minorities : |
| Remainder of title |
A comparative study |
| 264 #0 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE |
|---|
| Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice |
2022. |
| Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture |
القاهرة : |
| Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer |
كلية الحقوق - جامعة القاهرة، |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
342 صفحة : |
| Dimensions |
25 cm. |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rda content |
| Content type term |
text |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdamedia |
| Media type term |
Unmediated |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| Carrier type term |
volume |
| 502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE |
|---|
| Dissertation note |
أطروحة (دكتواره)-جامعة القاهرة، 2022. |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
|---|
| Bibliography, etc. note |
ببليوجرافيا: صفحات. 322-331. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
استهدف البحث إجراء دراسة مقارنه عن وضع الاقليات فى النظم القضائية فى مصر، وفرنسا، والولايات المتحدة الأمريكية من خلال تحليل الوضع الدستوري، والقانوني، والقضائي للأقليات في الدول الثلاثة مبتغيا الوصول إلى نتائج، وتوصيات للاستفادة بها فى إعادة رسم السياسات الدستورية، والقانونية، والقضائية للأقليات في جمهورية مصر العربية، وفى هذا الإطار، وفى سبيل تحقيق تلك الغاية استخدم البحث عده مناهج بحثيه على رأسها المنهج المقارن وهو المنهج المؤسس للبحث، والمنهج القانوني الذى أسس لإخراج الدراسة القانونية ومنهج دراسات الإتباع لتعلق البحث بالمهمشين، والإتباع، ولإيضاح مضمون حقوقهم مستخدما حاله الإدراك، والشعور، وهى حجر الزاوية في تأسيس مضمون حقوق الأقليات كما استخدم البحث المنهج التحليلي في إطار تحليل النصوص، وأحكام القضاء. خلص البحث بعد استخدام المناهج سالفة الذكر إلى أنه، وعلى الرغم من تعدد الدساتير المصرية، واختلاف مناهج تعاطيهم مع مسألة، وقضايا الأقليات، وتأثيرات تلك المناهج على النسيج التشريعي، ومن ثم احكام القضاء المصري إلا أن منهج تعاطى المشرع الدستوري، والقانوني، والقضاء المصري كان أكثر تطوراً من تعاطى المشرع الفرنسي، والأمريكي، وتعاطى القضاء الفرنسي، والأمريكي لمسألة، وقضايا الأقليات، ومنبع ذلك، ومصدرة هو اختلاف رؤية المجتمع المصري عن رؤية المجتمع الفرنسي، والأمريكي لقضايا الأقليات الذى انعكس على رؤية المشرع، ورؤية القضاء فى تلك الدول، ذلك أن المشرع الفرنسي، والأمريكي اتخذ منهجاً واضحاً فى إنكار وجود الأقليات رغبه منه فى صهر الأقليات فى مجتمع الأغلبية، إلا أن المشرع المصري لم يتخذ ذات المسلك. ولا شك أن هذان المسلكان المختلفان أثراً في الاتجاهات القضائية لكل من تلك الدول وانعكس على مدى تطور السياسات الخاصة بالأقليات في تلك الدول. إلا أنه وعلى الرغم من ذلك فإن البحث أنتهى إلى ضرورة إجراء مزيدا من التعديلات الدستورية والقانونية في النظام التشريعي المصري لمزيدٍ من المعالجة وصولاً إلى تأسيس نظاماً قانونياً، وقضائياً يتسم بالاستقرار الراسخ، والسلام الاجتماعي الكامل. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
The research aimed to conduc comparative study on th status of minorities in the judicial systems in Egypt, France, and the United States of America by analyzing the constitutional, legal, and judicial status of minorities in the three countries in order to reach results and recommendations for use in redrawing the constitutional, legal and judicial policies of minorities In the Arab Republic of Egypt, and in this context, and in order to achieve that end, the research used several research methods, on top of which is the comparative method, which is the founding method for research, and the legal method that was established to produce the legal study and the follow-up studies approach to the research's attachment to the marginalized, and the followers, and to clarify the content of their rights using the state of awareness And feeling, which is the cornerstone in establishing the content of minority rights. The research also used the analytical method in the framework of analyzing texts, and judicial rulings. The research concluded, after using the aforementioned curricula, that, despite the multiplicity of Egyptian constitutions, and their different approaches to dealing with the issue, minority issues, and the effects of those curricula on the legislative fabric, and then the rulings of the Egyptian judiciary. However, the approach of the constitutional and legal legislator, and the - 3 - Egyptian judiciary, was more developed than that of the French and American legislators and the French and American judiciary dealing with the issue and issues of minorities, and its source is the different vision of the Egyptian society from the vision of the French and American society of minority issues, which was reflected in the vision of the legislator, And the vision of the judiciary in those countries, because the French and American legislators took a clear approach in denying the existence of minorities in their desire to fuse minorities into the majority society, but the Egyptian legislator did not take the same course. There is no doubt that these two different behaviors affected the judicial trends of each of those countries and was reflected in the development of the policies of minorities in those countries. However, despite this, the research concluded that some constitutional and legal amendments should be made in the Egyptian legislative system for further treatment in order to establish a legal and judicial system characterized by firm stability and complete social peace |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
The research aimed to conduct a comparative study on the status of minorities in the judicial systems in Egypt, France, and the United States of America by analysing the constitutional, legal, and judicial status of minorities in the three countries in order to reach results and recommendations for use in re- drawing the constitutional, legal and judicial policies of minorities In the Arab Republic of Egypt, and in this context, and in order to achieve that end, the research used several research methods, on top of which is the comparative method, which is the founding method for research, and the legal method that was established to produce the legal study and the follow-up studies approach to the research's attachment to the marginalized, and the followers, and to clarify the content of their rights using the state of awareness And feeling, which is the cornerstone in establishing the content of minority rights. The research also used the analytical method in the framework of analysing texts, and judicial rulings.<br/>The research concluded, after using the aforementioned curricula, that, despite the multiplicity of Egyptian constitutions, and their different approaches to dealing with the issue, minority issues, and the effects of those curricula on the legislative fabric, and then the rulings of the Egyptian judiciary. However, the approach of the constitutional and legal legislator, and the Egyptian judiciary, was more developed than that of the French and American legislators and the French and American judiciary dealing with the issue and issues of minorities, and its source is the different vision of the Egyptian society from the vision of the French and American society of minority issues, which was reflected in the vision of the legislator, And the vision of the judiciary in those countries, because the French and American legislators took a clear approach in denying the existence of minorities in their desire to fuse minorities into the majority society, but the Egyptian legislator did not take the same course.<br/>There is no doubt that these two different behaviours affected the judicial trends of each of those countries and was reflected in the development of the policies of minorities in those countries.<br/>However, despite this, the research concluded that some constitutional and legal amendments should be made in the Egyptian legislative system for further treatment in order to establish a legal and judicial system characterized by firm stability and complete social peace. |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
|---|
| Text Language |
النص بالعربية والملخص باللغة الإنجليزية والعربية. |
| 650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
النظام القانوني للأقليات |
| 650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
الأقلية الدينية |
| 650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
حقوق الأقليات في المواثيق الدولية |
| 650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
الحقوق العامة والخاصة للأقليات |
| 650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
الأقليات في مصر |
| 650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
الحق في الحفاظ على الهوية |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
النظام القانوني للأقليات |
| 655 ## - INDEX TERM--GENRE/FORM |
|---|
| Genre/form data or focus term |
رسائل جامعية |
| Geographic subdivision |
جامعة القاهرة |
| General subdivision |
2022 |
| 700 0# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
جابر جاد نصار. |
| Relator term |
|
| 710 ## - ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME |
|---|
| Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element |
جامعة القاهرة |
| Subordinate unit |
كلية الحقوق |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="http://195.246.42.239/public/th/T07-00374.pdf">http://195.246.42.239/public/th/T07-00374.pdf</a> |
| 900 ## - Thesis Information |
|---|
| Grant date |
2022 |
| Universities |
جامعة القاهرة |
| Faculties |
كلية الحقوق |
| Department |
قسم القانون العام |
| 905 ## - Cataloger and Reviser Names |
|---|
| Cataloger Name: |
Mariam |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Koha item type |
Thesis |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Edition |
21 |