02756cam a2200361 i 4500003000900000005001700009008004100026020002400067040003700091043002100128050001000149082001200159100003400171245011600205264004400321300006300365336002600428337002600454338003600480500008200516504005100598505031100649520091600960588006801876650004501944650005101989650005002040650003402090650004002124650003902164776013102203856006002334EG-GICUC20260505094136.0250306s2010    enk    frb    001 0 eng d  z9781841138718qhbk.  aDLCbengerdaepncDLCdEG-GiCUC  ae------an-us---00aK385004221a3471 aMarco Colino, Sandra,eauthor10aVertical agreements and competition law :ba comparative study of the EU and US regimes /cSandra Marco Colino. 1aOxford ;aPortland, Or. :bHart,c2010.  a1 online resource (xxii, 199 pages)billustrations,c24 cm  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  aBased on the author's thesis (doctoral)--European University Institute, 2007.  aIncludes bibliographical references and index.00aThe enduring debate on the nature of vertical agreements -- Theorising vertical restraints : the intellectual foundations of EC competition law and US antitrust models -- Questioning the achievement of an adequate economic analysis -- The impact of competition rules on vertical contractural relationships.1 a"This book focuses on the current legal framework for vertical agreements in the EU and the US. Over the last ten years, antitrust rules governing these agreements have undergone thorough reform. In the EU, the old sector-specific block exemptions were replaced by Regulation 2790/99, applicable to all sectors of the economy. In addition, changes introduced to the procedural rules have led to the decentralisation of Article 81(3) and the removal of the notification requirement. In like manner, in the US the Supreme Court has gradually taken vertical restraints out of the per se illegality rule. What Sylvania achieved in placing non-price vertical restraints under the rule of reason in the late 1970s, the Khan judgment did for maximum resale price maintenance in 1997, whilst most recently and most significantly in 2007 the Leegin case followed suit for minimum resale price maintenance."--BOOK JACKET.  aDescription based on print version record; resource not viewed. 0aAntitrust lawzEuropean Union countries. 0aExclusive contractszEuropean Union countries. 0aRestraint of tradezEuropean Union countries. 0aAntitrust lawzUnited States. 0aExclusive contractszUnited States. 0aRestraint of tradezUnited States.08iPrint Version:tVertical agreements and competition lawdOxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart, 2010.z9781841138718w(DLC) 201128929340uhttps://fll.law.cu.edu.eg/fulltext/bks/ENGB13-00119.pdf